Evaluating Large Language Models: Unveiling Insights, Ensuring Impact
Vaishnavi Patil
August 17, 2023

What is large language model?

Large Language Models (LLMs) are a pivotal subset of artificial intelligence (AI) which leverage deep learning algorithms to process and comprehend human language through extensive training on massive datasets. They can be used for a variety of tasks, such as generating text, code, translating languages, and writing different kinds of creative content and much more. When a user seeks information, ensuring the accuracy of the response becomes crucial.

Evaluating Large Language Models:

Large language model’s evaluation pertains to the systematic assessment of the performance and effectiveness of the generated responses. This process involves subjecting the model to diverse tasks, prompts, or queries to gauge its ability to generate coherent, contextually appropriate, and accurate responses.

Generally Large language models are not only evaluated to check if the model can predict the next token with the highest accuracy, they are also evaluated “Qualitatively”. For example, In the context of writing a novel, the key priority shifts from the language model's capacity to anticipate the next word to its capability to produce a story that is both logically connected, imaginative, and impartial.

The evaluation process for large language models typically follows this sequence: an input prompt is provided, and the model generates an output. This output is then assessed by comparing it against a predefined set of ideal answers, enabling us to gauge the proficiency of the language model. There are different metrics available for specific tasks.

Importance of Assessing LLMs and Evaluation Challenges:

LLMs are not always perfect. They can sometimes generate incorrect or biased results. Therefore, it is important to evaluate LLMs before they are deployed in real-world applications.

Consider a simple example of a medical QA bot. You'd input a diagnosis (query), and the system might recommend medicines with dosages (response). Such a system will retrieve information (context) from a medicine database, collate the context and the query (prompt), and finally use an LLM to generate a response. In such cases, accuracy of the responses is very important.

The evaluation of large language models holds significant importance as it gauges their quality and utility across various applications. Below are outlined practical instances underscoring the significance of appraising these models.

  1. Ensuring Reliable Information: Large language models are often used to provide information and answer questions. Accurate evaluation guarantees that the information these models generate is reliable and trustworthy, especially in critical domains like healthcare, law, and education.
  1. Mitigating Biases: Language models can inadvertently learn biases present in their training data, leading to biased or discriminatory outputs. Evaluation helps identify and mitigate these biases, ensuring fairness and inclusivity in AI-generated content.
  1. Comparing Different Models: A company picks and adjusts a model to work better on tasks specific to their industry. They do this by looking at different models and figuring out which one fits their needs best.
  1. Earning User Confidence: Checking what users say and how much they trust the answers from LLMs is really important. This helps create systems that people can rely on and that match what users expect and what's considered normal in society.
  1. Real-World Applicability: Accurate evaluation ensures that language models meet the requirements of real-world applications. Whether it's customer support chatbots or content generation tools, reliable outputs are crucial.

Challenges in Evaluating Large Language:

What are metrics?  

Metrics in the context of large language models refer to standardized measurements used to quantitatively evaluate the performance and quality of the model's generated text.    

The Traditional evaluation metrics rely on the arrangement and order of words and phrases in the text and are used in combination where a reference text (ground truth) exists to compare the predictions against.  

Whereas the Nontraditional metrics makes use of semantic structure and capabilities of language models for evaluating generated text.  

Evaluations are a set of measurements used to assess a model’s performance on a task. They include benchmark data and metrics.    

  1. Perplexity: It measures how well the model predicts the probability distribution of a test dataset. A lower perplexity value indicates better performance.  


  1. BLEU: The Bilingual Evaluation Understudy (BLEU) score is a metric used to evaluate the quality of machine translation output by comparing it to one or more reference translations. It ranges from 0 to 1, with 1 indicating perfect translation.  
  1. ROUGE: The Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation (ROUGE) score is a family of metrics used for evaluating automatic summarization and machine translation systems. It measures the overlap between the generated summary and the reference summaries.
  1. F1 Score: A measure of a model's accuracy, combining precision and recall. It is commonly used in binary classification tasks to evaluate the performance of a model on a given dataset.
  1. Accuracy: Accuracy is the proportion of correct predictions made by the model out of all predictions. It's a common metric for classification tasks.  
  1. Human Evaluation: Direct assessment by human evaluators to judge the quality of generated text based on factors like fluency, coherence, and relevance.

Comprehensive comparison of various evaluation frameworks and benchmarks:  

As natural language processing continues to advance, the need for robust evaluation tools and benchmarks becomes increasingly important.  

Framework Name Description Pros Cons
Hugging Face Eval A toolkit for evaluating LLMs on a variety of different tasks. Easy to use and it supports a variety of different LLMs. Not as comprehensive as some of the other tools on this list.
EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness A tool that is designed to evaluate LLMs on a variety of different tasks. It is compatible with a variety of different LLMs. It is not as widely used as some of the other tools on this list.
Big Bench Generalization abilities Comprehensive and covers a wide range of tasks. Can be difficult to use.
GLUE Benchmark Grammar, Paraphrasing, Text Similarity, Inference, Textual Entailment, Resolving Pronoun References Widely used and well-established. Can be biased towards certain language models.
MMLU Language understanding across various tasks and domains Comprehensive and covers a wide range of tasks. Not as widely used as other frameworks.
OpenICL Few-shot evaluation and performance in a wide range of tasks with minimal fine-tuning Easy to use and effective at evaluating few-shot learning models. Not as widely used as other frameworks.
OpenAI Evals Accuracy, Diversity, Consistency, Robustness, Transferability, Efficiency, Fairness of text generated Comprehensive and covers a wide range of factors. Can be difficult to use.
ParlAI Accuracy, F1 score, Perplexity, Human evaluation, Speed & resource utilization, Robustness, Generalization Comprehensive and covers a wide range of factors. Not as widely used as other frameworks.
CoQA Understand a text passage and answer a series of interconnected questions Evaluates important abilities for conversational AI models. Not as widely used as other frameworks.
LAMBADA Long-term understanding using prediction of the last word of a passage Evaluates long-term understanding abilities of models. Not as widely used as other frameworks.
HellaSwag Reasoning abilities Evaluates reasoning abilities of models. Not as widely used as other frameworks.
LogiQA Logical reasoning abilities Evaluates logical reasoning abilities of models. Not as widely used as other frameworks.
MultiNLI Understanding relationships between sentences across different genres Evaluates understanding of relationships between sentences. Not as widely used as other frameworks.
SQUAD Reading comprehension tasks Evaluates reading comprehension abilities of models. Not as widely used as other frameworks.

Potential Future Developments and Areas for Improvement:



As we conclude this exploration, the importance of LLM evaluation is undeniable. It not only validates their capabilities but also sets the standards for responsible AI deployment. In the ever-evolving landscape of artificial intelligence, robust evaluation ensures that LLMs evolve to be not just powerful, but also reliable, ethical, and beneficial tools that enrich our digital experiences and empower human endeavors.

We hope you found our blog post informative. If you have any project inquiries or would like to discuss your data and analytics needs, please don't hesitate to contact us at info@predera.com. We're here to help! Thank you for reading.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.